ARCHIVE
2009 Archive
Homepage Quick Links
2008 Archive
What We're Saying
Newsroom
Downloads
2007 Archive
What We're Saying
Newsroom
Downloads
Homepage Quick Links
August 26, 2009
AB 32 Implementation Group's Letter to the California Congressional Delegation requesting that Congress advocates that federal climate change legislation be written to enhance the competitiveness of California businesses and industry.
April 8, 2009
Preliminary Review of the CARB Staff Analysis of the Proposed Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)The LCFS to be adopted next week by CARB would, by 2020, increase fuel costs by $3.7 billion a year and increase smog-forming chemicals by five tons a day, says a just-released independent economic analysis of the program.
VIDEO: Stakeholder Comments to the California Air Resources Board regarding the AB 32 Scoping Plan.
2008 What We're Saying
December 1, 2008
Memo to CARB Regarding Legislative Analyst Office Report on the Scoping Plan Economic Analysis
November 26, 2008
Comments on Preliminary Draft Staff Proposal on Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Significance Thresholds for Greenhouse Gases under CEQA (Oct. 24, 2008)
November 4, 2008
Comments to CARB on the Final Scoping Plan
Specific recommendations for how CARB should proceed
October 24, 2008
Letter to the California Energy Commission RE: GHG emissions under CEQA
October 23, 2008
Letter to CARB Chair, Mary Nichols, commenting on the Economic Analysis Supplement to the Draft Scoping Plan and Analysis Group report on CARB’s Economic Analysis.
September 23, 2008
Letter to Governor Schwarzenegger RE: Principles for Implementing a Successful Low Carbon Fuel Standard
August 15, 2008
Our comments on the Western Climate Initiative draft design of the Regional Cap and Trade Program
AB 32 IG wants to ensure the Program is developed in a way that helps members manage operating costs by increasing energy efficiency efforts and deploying more renewable energy projects. To do this it is imperative that a robust and fair carbon offset market be created that encourages voluntary participation.
June 9, 2008
Letter to CARB Chair, Mary Nichols, regarding the development of the Scoping Plan and Policy Comments
May 9, 2008
Letter to CARB on Cost Containment for AB 32
April 21, 2008
Letter to CARB Research and Economics Studies Branch commenting on the role offsets should play in the implementation of AB 32.
April 16, 2008
Letter to Chuck Shulock of CARB following up on our meeting regarding the low carbon fuel standard.
March 19, 2008
Letter to Gov. Schwarzenegger urging his continued support of market-based solutions to reducing carbon emmissions.
March 5, 2008
Letter to Bay Area Air Quality Management District on proposed fees for district climate change activities
February 27, 2008
Letter to Gov. Schwarzenegger and CARB Board on Attorney General's Local Activities
Letter supporting the orderly implementation of AB 32 instead of the chaotic manner in which the AG's recent actions are causing California's climate change strategy to be written.
January 30, 2008
Letter to Chuck Schulock of CARB urging that fair and equitable funding and fees be adopted
2008 Newsroom
Marysville Appeal-Democrat, December 14, 2008
Our View: Wrong plan at wrong time
ARB global warming plan costly, unnecessary
San Diego Union Tribune, December 11, 2008
Op-Ed: AB 32 / Combating global warming Addressing change will not be cheap or easy
Orange County Register, December 11, 2008
Editorial: Wrong plan (greenhouse gases) at wrong time (recession)
Sacramento Bee, December 11, 2008
Editorial: Time for candor on climate plan
San Diego Union Tribune, December 11, 2008
Editorial: We're no model
AB 32 fiasco shows state doesn't know best
San Diego Union Tribune, December 8, 2008
Editorial: Dishonest debate
Credible climate policy skeptics are ignored
Capitol Weekly, December 4, 2008
LAO criticizes key fiscal points in greenhouse plan
San Diego Union Trubune, November 27, 2008
LAO to the rescue
It shreds claims climate policy will spur boom
Capitol Weekly, November 6, 2008
Op-Ed: State’s Rosy Analysis of AB 32 is a Danger to Its Success
Fresno Bee, October 25, 2008
Emissions plan needs full debate
Reducing greenhouse gases in state will be difficult, but we must make the effort.
Orange County Register, October 22, 2008
Putting the heat on faltering economy
Here's a reality check for California's global-warming bureaucrats
Bloomberg.com, October 15, 2008
California Unveils Final Version of Climate-Change Regulations
Associated Press, October 15, 2008
California releases plan to cut greenhouse gases
Monterey County Herald, September 18, 2008
Tour touts green message to business
Riverside Press Enterprise, September 9, 2008
EDITORIAL: Climate Affront
Riverside Press Enterprise, August 22, 2008
EDITORIAL: Climate Cost?
San Diego Union Tribune, August 18, 2008
OPINION - Meeting California's Energy Needs
KRCR-Channel 7, August 4, 2008
Global Warming Solutions Act
San Diego Business Journal, July 7, 2008
Hidden Tax on Carbon Trading Is a Bad Idea
San Diego Union Tribune, June 25, 2008
Op-Ed: Global warming solutions: do your homework
Capitol Weekly, June 12, 2008
Op-Ed: Global warming solutions: do your homework
The New York Times, May 14, 2008
The Post-Bush Climate Editorial
The New York Times, April 13, 2008
Sizing Up the Utilities, if Carbon Caps Take Hold
Sacramento Bee Story, April 12, 2008
Jack M. Stewart: Caution needed on road to new fuels
Sacramento Bee Editorial, March 28, 2008
Cap-and-trade system needs a chance to work
San Jose Mercury News Op-Ed, March 19, 2008
David Yarnold: Cap-and-trade can help fight global warming
Sacramento Bee Op-Ed, March 16, 2008
Lawrence Goulder and Robert Stavins: State fight against climate change benefits everyone
2008 Downloads
Advocacy Work Plan for 2008
December 10, 2008
Open Letter to CARB
This letter, representing 65 California business and taxpayer organizations, expresses concern regarding the economic analysis of the AB 32 Scoping Plan, stating the Plan as currently written seriously underestimates the cost AB 32 implementation will have on consumers and business and the negative impact it will have on jobs and the economy. The letter asks CARB to conduct a new economic analysis to make sure the plan is the right way to protect California jobs and the economy while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
September 30, 2008
Green Building Carbon Credit Proposal submitted to ARB.
Why CARB Needs to Take the Time to Implement AB 32 Correctly
State decision-makers should require that CARB take the time necessary to satisfy all of the AB 32 criteria. Before proceeding with adoption of any regulations, CARB should redo its AB 32 scoping plan economic analysis to address the major flaws identified by its peer reviewers, the LAO and stakeholders.
2007 What We're Saying
December 10, 2007
Comments on AB 32 Scoping Plan
December 5, 2007
Comments on the CARB’s Draft Mandatory Reporting Regulation
July 24, 2007
Comments on Market Advisory Committee Report
When developing a cap-and-trade system to reduce greenhouse gas, we recommend that CARB recognize the costs savings a cap-and-trade system has over a command-and-control rule.
July 24, 2007
Letter to California Air Resources Board (CARB)
Request that all information submitted to CARB
regarding AB 32 implementation be made public.
June 29, 2007
Letter to Gov. Schwarzenegger and other state leaders regarding CEQA Lawsuits
Over 40 organizations joined AB 32 IG in asking state leaders to remedy the problem of project-delaying lawsuits that claim CEQA requires an analysis of climate change impacts.
June 7, 2007
Letter to CARB regarding greenhouse gas fees
Fees charged for greenhouse gas programs managed by the state should be appropriately balanced between emitters and capped at a level adequate to cover the mandated regulatory program of AB 32, said the AB 32 Implementation Group in a letter to the California Air Resources Board.
May 8, 2007
Comments to CARB on Discrete Early Actions draft
In written comments to CARB regarding proposed Discrete Early Actions to reduce emissions, the AB 32 Implementation Group focused on whether the draft actions are cost-effective. The submitted letter states, “Staff did not provide any guidance on their definition of cost-effectiveness nor was any information provided on the methodology or legal basis for such a definition. We hope that such information will be forthcoming …”
April 24, 2007
Recommendations to MAC on market mechanism to accompany California's greenhouse gas program
In addition to suggesting specific principles and guidelines for the MAC to follow, we argued that a well-designed market mechanism – one with high transparency, depth of trade and low transaction costs – will speed new technologies to the
market and minimize the cost of compliance to achieve the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions envisioned by AB 32.
2007 Newsroom
San Jose Mercury News, August 31, 2007
Western states show the way with climate initiative
Los Angeles Daily News, August 14, 2007
Emissions cuts costly
San Francisco Chronicle, July 15, 2007
Making sense of pollution markets
San Francisco Chronicle,
March 21, 2007
'Cap
and trade' gaining favor
San Jose Business Journal, March 19, 2007
Eco-fight
looms on gas credit
Contra Costa Times,
January 23, 2007
Firms
seek clarification on new emissions laws
San Francisco Chronicle,
January 23, 2007
State
starts work on plan to curb greenhouse gases
2007 Downloads
